Mega Pixels - How Many Do You Need?
(This really happened; but it could have been my
story too!)
Today I overheard a sales clerk describing the different
mega pixel
cameras available and what size of photos you can print with them. I
didn't agree with the clerk's statements, that seemed to encourage the
customer to buy more mega pixels (more expensive camera) than he might
need or is necessary. I've also read many articled that would support the
clerk's statements; so I'm not saying the clerk was wrong either. This is
about what I've experienced and I am happy with.
|
From The Computer Paper
December 2002, Page 14, Edmonton Edition
"As a general rule of thumb, one-mega pixel
cameras
should allow you to make decent 3x5-inch prints, a two-mega pixel camera
will give you 4x6-inch or even 5x7-inch prints, and with a three-mega
pixel
model you can probably get decent 8x10s. At four mega pixels and beyond,
you should be able to do with a digital camera everything you would want
to do with a 35-mm camera as a casual hobbyist."
|
I own three digital cameras - 1.2, 2.1 and 4
mega pixels. I print on an HP PhotoSmart P1000 printer which uses 8.5" x 11"
paper. (Better printers are more affordable now.)
My 1.2 mega pixel camera photos will print very good 4" x 6" prints.
I've even printed a few good 5" x 7" prints when the subject was still and
had good lighting - bright sun, in shadow portraits.
With my 2.1 mega pixel camera, I regularly
print 8" x 10"s.
Maybe you'll be more critical, like the
experts; but I'm really happy with what I print and am proud to give
them as gifts.
Do you need more mega pixels? I bought the four mega pixel camera
because I wanted a shirt pocket sized camera that I could carry with me
anytime, anywhere and the price and the technology was within my limits. I
have yet to print any digital image larger than 8" x 10." When was the
last time you had one of your pictures printed larger?
(Update: I have had an 11" x 14" photo printed from
that 4 mega pixel camera with excellent results.)
In fact, I occasionally find the 4 mega pixel, larger files a bit of a
problem. They have doubled the number of CD-Rs I need to store a month's
worth of photos. (Now, with 5 and 8 megapixel
cameras, I need DVDs.) They need to be resized (smaller) for any web pages and
for e-mailing to most of my friends and relatives. I also find the larger
files do not resize well when I want to print a collage of many small
photos on an 8" x 10" print. Here is a little more of today's story.
It seems the husband wanted to "move up" to a digital
camera. He was the one who played with the computer and printer at home.
His wife also wanted a new camera, but didn't do the computer thing. Her
problem was she wanted to have prints in her hand to look at, carry round
and give out - difficult with a digital. Or is it?
With a 35 mm. film camera, you still have to purchase
the film, pay for the developing and printing, even the bad and not so
good ones. You'll probably not take very many extra photos either.
With a digital camera there is the larger initial cost
of the camera, a few extra memory cards and batteries and charger. Take
all the photos you want. Take a hundred of the new baby or the birthday
boy. Bracket when you want. Take those low light photos to see what
you get. Take a picture of behind the fridge to see what's there. Want to
remember a price list in the store? Trying to match a pattern? Take
a photo of it.
My mother usually cut off a head, or the feet or even half a body. With
the digital camera you can see right away if its good. Forgot the flash,
take another. Someone moved, take another photo.
Feel free to experiment. It only cost to recharge the batteries.
Delete anything you don't want so only the good, better,
best ones are left.
Don't own or use the computer? Take your memory card to
the drugstore and pay them to print only your best ones. Order extras of
that one special photo right away because you've already seen it on the
camera. No negatives. Have the files stored on a CD at the same time.
I'm not saying that my digital cameras take
better
quality photos. They don't. I have good 35 mm. SLR cameras sitting in the
closet. But I sure have enjoyed my digital cameras more over the past
three years. I've taken several thousand photos instead of several
hundred. I've also given more printed photos away, along with the digital
ones I've shared on CDs with family members.
I think my wife has even forgiven me for buying my
first, second and third digital camera. She is not afraid to take more
than a few extras to get the right one. I try to make the effort and print
the good ones quickly, and as many as she wants to give to family and
friends.
Here is a
table showing a few quality settings and their
approximate file sizes for 5,6 and 8 megapixel cameras.
I have a few pages I call "Web
demos" and a web "Gallery"
of places and stuff.
-
View example photos taken with my one
mega pixel camera. You can
download the untouched camera files and print your own to see how they
look.
-
Compare image sizes (not photo quality) from my three cameras.
-
Learn about optical zoom verses
digital zoom
-
and more.
|